학술 논문 작성에서의 생성형 AI 서비스 활용 행태에 대한 탐색적 연구 - CRediT(Contributor Roles Taxonomy)의 역할 분류를 중심으로 -

Exploring the Use of Generative AI Services in Scholarly Writing Process: A CRediT(Contributor Roles Taxonomy)-Based Approach

초록

This exploratory study investigates how researchers across various academic disciplines utilize generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the scholarly writing process and what factors influence their use. Grounded in the Task-based Information Behavior theory and the CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) framework, this study employed a structured survey targeting graduate-level and professional researchers. A total of 113 valid responses were collected via an online questionnaire. The results show that approximately 90% of respondents had experience using generative AI tools when writing papers, with the highest usage reported in tasks related to “Writing - Review & Editing”, “Writing - Original Draft Preparation”, and “Conceptualization”. Differences in AI usage patterns were observed across academic fields and career stages in some tasks. Key challenges cited by respondents included concerns over the reliability and subject-matter competence of AI-generated outputs. In order to utilize generative AI responsibly, academic libraries need to provide practical support such as supporting access to paid tools, providing ethical usage guidelines, and curated comparative evaluations of different AI platforms. The purpose of this study is to provide basic data for this.

키워드

생성형 인공지능; 논문 작성; 정보행태; CRediT 역할 분류; 과업 중심 정보추구; 연구지원 서비스; Generative Artificial Intelligence; Scholarly Writing; Information Behavior; Contributor Roles Taxonomy(CRediT); Task-based Information Seeking; Research Support Services
제목
학술 논문 작성에서의 생성형 AI 서비스 활용 행태에 대한 탐색적 연구 - CRediT(Contributor Roles Taxonomy)의 역할 분류를 중심으로 -
제목 (타언어)
Exploring the Use of Generative AI Services in Scholarly Writing Process: A CRediT(Contributor Roles Taxonomy)-Based Approach
저자
최아름; 최재황
DOI
10.16981/kliss.56.2.202506.153
발행일
2025-06
유형
Y
저널명
한국도서관·정보학회지
권
56
호
2
페이지
153 ~ 175