한국과 중국의 유아 성교육 연구 동향 비교분석 -2001년∼2021년을 중심으로-

초록

Purpose: This study aims to examine research trends in sexuality education on early childhood in Korea and China, identify potential areas for improvement, and provide foundational data to support the advancement and revitalization of sexuality education in both countries. Methods: A comparative content analysis was conducted on 100 Korean and 64 Chinese academic papers on early childhood sexuality education published between 2001 and 2021. The analysis focused on four dimensions: research period, research topics, research subjects, and research methods. Results: In terms of research periods, Korea was most active during the first period (2001–2005), publishing 35 papers (35.0%), whereas China experienced a rapid increase during the fourth period (2016–2021), reaching 42 papers (64.1%). Regarding research topics, Korea concentrated primarily on “current situation and awareness” (52.0%) and “teaching methods”(39.0%). China, on the other hand, placed greater emphasis on “curriculum” (18.6%) and “cultivation of sexuality concepts” (25.0%). The main research subjects in both countries were infants and young children (37.3% in Korea, 40.5% in China), followed by Korean parents (30.0%) and Chinese teachers (26.2%). Material-based studies accounted for 6.3% in Korea and 13.1% in China. Although China had a relatively higher proportion, both countries showed limited emphasis on this type of research. Methodologically, quantitative research accounted for the highest proportion in Korea (71.0%), while integrated research was the most common in China (54.7%). Conclusion: In Korea, research was rapidly activated based on the early introduction of policies and the establishment of institutional foundations, whereas in China, research surged after the mid-2010s in response to national policies and social demands.The research in both countries is centered on infants and young children and focuses on human subjects, including teachers and parents, while research on material subjects such as media and materials is relatively insufficient. “Current situation and awareness” was the most common research topic, while China focused on “sexuality concept development” and “curriculum.” In terms of research methods, Korea concentrated quantitative research, while China focused on integrated research, and qualitative research was insufficient in both countries. Future research should expand qualitative approaches and the analysis of material resources.

키워드