중등 예비교사의 AI 활용 수업에 대한 기대-가치-비용 프로파일 분석: 영향요인 탐색 및 수용의도 차이 검증

Analysis of Expectancy-Value-Cost Profiles Regarding AI-Integrated Instruction Among Pre-service Secondary Teachers: Exploring Influential Factors and Differences in Acceptance Intentions

초록

The purpose of this study was to identify the profiles of expectancy-value-cost about AI-integrated instruction among pre-service secondary teachers, examine the predictive factors influencing profile membership, and explore differences in acceptance intention across profiles. Participants included 307 student teachers from college of education at two universities in D city and K region. Three latent profiles emerged: ‘Balanced Practitioner(66.4%)’, ‘Anxiously Implementer(27.4%)’, and ‘Disengaged Integrator(6.2%)’. Individual innovativeness, professional attitude, AI trust, teacher career preparation, and gender significantly predicted profile membership. Higher innovativeness, professional attitude, and AI trust increased the likelihood of belonging to the Balanced Practitioner profile, while lower career preparation was linked to the Disengaged Integrator profile. Females were more likely to be in the Balanced Practitioner profile. Significant differences in acceptance intention for AI-integrated instruction across three profiles were observed, with the Balanced Practitioner profile demonstrating the highest acceptance intention. Implications for designing teacher education programs to foster emotional stability and motivational readiness for AI-integrated instruction were discussed.

키워드

AI 활용 수업; 기대-가치 이론; 기대-가치-비용; 수용의도; 중등 예비교사; AI-Integrated Instruction; Expectancy-Value Theory; Expectancy-Value-Cost; Acceptance Intention; Pre-service Secondary Teachers
제목
중등 예비교사의 AI 활용 수업에 대한 기대-가치-비용 프로파일 분석: 영향요인 탐색 및 수용의도 차이 검증
제목 (타언어)
Analysis of Expectancy-Value-Cost Profiles Regarding AI-Integrated Instruction Among Pre-service Secondary Teachers: Exploring Influential Factors and Differences in Acceptance Intentions
저자
최자윤; 손원숙
DOI
10.29221/jce.2025.28.3.215
발행일
2025-08
유형
Y
저널명
교육과정평가연구
권
28
호
3
페이지
215 ~ 238