Empirical Therapy Versus Tailored Therapy of Helicobacter pylori in Korea: Results of the K-CREATE Study

  • Kim, Joon Sung; 
  • Kim, Byung-Wook; 
  • Kim, Jin Il; 
  • Chung, Woo Chul; 
  • Jung, Sung Woo; 
  • ... Jeon, Seon Woo; 
  • 외 12명
Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

8
Citations

SCOPUS

11

초록

Background: The optimal duration of regimens for tailored therapy based on genotypic resistance for clarithromycin has yet to be established. Aim: This study was a nationwide, multicenter, randomized trial comparing empirical therapy with tailored therapy based on genotypic resistance for first-line eradication of Helicobacter pylori. We also compared the eradication rates of 7- and 14-day regimens for each group. Patients and Methods: Patients with H. pylori infection were first randomized to receive empirical or tailored therapy. Patients in each group were further randomized into 7- or 14-day regimens. Empirical therapy consisted of a triple therapy (TT) regimen (twice-daily doses of pantoprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, and clarithromycin 500 mg) for 7 or 14 days. Tailored therapy consisted of TT of 7 or 14 days in patients without genotypic resistance. Patients with genotypic resistance were treated with bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) regimens (twice-daily doses of pantoprazole 40 mg, three daily doses of metronidazole 500 mg, and four times daily doses of bismuth 300 mg and tetracycline 500 mg) for 7 or 14 days. A 13C-urea breath test assessed eradication rates. The primary outcome was eradication rates of each group. Results: A total of 593 patients were included in the study. The eradication rates were 65.7% (201/306) in the empirical therapy group and 81.9% (235/287) in the tailored therapy group for intention-to-treat analysis (p < 0.001). In the per-protocol analysis, the eradication rates of the empirical therapy and tailored groups were 70.3% (201/286) and 85.5% (235/274) (p < 0.001), respectively. There was no difference in compliance between the two groups. The rate of adverse events was higher in the tailored group compared to the empirical group (p < 0.001). Discussion: Our study confirmed that tailored therapy based on genotypic resistance was more effective than empirical therapy for H. pylori eradication in Korea. However, no significant difference was found between 7- and 14-day regimens for each group. Future studies are needed to determine the optimal duration of therapy for empirical and tailored therapy regimens.

키워드

drug resistance; eradication; Helicobacter; PCR; tailored therapy; ERADICATION; RESISTANCE; TIME
제목
Empirical Therapy Versus Tailored Therapy of Helicobacter pylori in Korea: Results of the K-CREATE Study
저자
Kim, Joon Sung; Kim, Byung-Wook; Kim, Jin Il; Chung, Woo Chul; Jung, Sung Woo; Bang, Chang Seok; Kim, Gwang Ha; Jeon, Seon Woo; Joo, Moon Kyoung; Lee, Si Hyung; Lim, Yun Jeong; Sung, Jae Kyu; Seo, Seung Young; Park, Sun Young; Lee, Wan Sik; Lee, Hang Lak; Kim, Ki Bae; Kim, Heung Up
DOI
10.1111/hel.13126
발행일
2024-07
유형
Article
저널명
Helicobacter
권
29
호
4